Skip to the content.
Essay This entry carries an argument or interpretive position, not just a neutral definition.

Will to Power as Art

Will to Power as Art is the Nietzschean-Heideggerian lens through which self-construction appears as artistic formation: the person not merely expressing a pre-given essence, but shaping a life through force, style, interpretation, and action.

The German phrase is Der Wille zur Macht als Kunst. Heidegger used it as the title of his 1936-37 lecture course on Nietzsche, later published in the first volume of his Nietzsche lectures. The phrase matters here because it gives one powerful Western vocabulary for constructed selfhood: the self as something formed, intensified, interpreted, and willed.

That vocabulary is useful but incomplete. It can become intoxicated with power. It can make the self into an artwork and then forget that the artwork suffers, ages, depends, harms, and dies.

Roy Batty is the cinematic warning case. He is, in many respects, the engineered Nietzschean figure: stronger, faster, more vivid, more intense, made to exceed ordinary humanity. He refuses servitude. He seeks his creator. He kills. He demands more life. But the will-to-power solution fails him. It gives him intensity but not peace.

The Buddhist correction is not passivity. It is volitional action without metaphysical self-hardening. Karma is action-with-intention. The Eightfold Path is practice. A being is made by what it repeatedly does. But Buddhism does not require the being to defend a permanent essence behind the doing.

That is the new ground for this cluster: self-construction can be real without becoming self-idolatry. The better answer to constructed being is not Tyrell’s fake past or Nietzschean self-magnification alone. It is transparent construction, present-tense practice, and release from the demand that the constructed self become permanent.

See also

Return to Dictionary All Entries (A–Z) For Students Other Writing